U.S. Senate
See Full Big Line
(D) J. Hickenlooper*
(R) Somebody
80%
20%
Governor
See Full Big Line
(D) Joe Neguse
(D) Phil Weiser
(D) Jena Griswold
60%
60%
40%↓
Att. General
See Full Big Line
(D) M. Dougherty
(D) Alexis King
(D) Brian Mason
40%
40%
30%
Sec. of State
See Full Big Line
(D) George Stern
(D) A. Gonzalez
(R) Sheri Davis
40%
40%
30%
State Treasurer
See Full Big Line
(D) Brianna Titone
(R) Kevin Grantham
(D) Jerry DiTullio
60%
30%
20%
CO-01 (Denver)
See Full Big Line
(D) Diana DeGette*
(R) Somebody
90%
2%
CO-02 (Boulder-ish)
See Full Big Line
(D) Joe Neguse*
(R) Somebody
90%
2%
CO-03 (West & Southern CO)
See Full Big Line
(R) Jeff Hurd*
(D) Somebody
80%
40%
CO-04 (Northeast-ish Colorado)
See Full Big Line
(R) Lauren Boebert*
(D) Somebody
90%
10%
CO-05 (Colorado Springs)
See Full Big Line
(R) Jeff Crank*
(D) Somebody
80%
20%
CO-06 (Aurora)
See Full Big Line
(D) Jason Crow*
(R) Somebody
90%
10%
CO-07 (Jefferson County)
See Full Big Line
(D) B. Pettersen*
(R) Somebody
90%
10%
CO-08 (Northern Colo.)
See Full Big Line
(R) Gabe Evans*
(D) Yadira Caraveo
(D) Joe Salazar
50%
40%
40%
State Senate Majority
See Full Big Line
DEMOCRATS
REPUBLICANS
80%
20%
State House Majority
See Full Big Line
DEMOCRATS
REPUBLICANS
95%
5%
May 14, 2007 06:22 PM UTC
20 Comments
Loading ...
Rudy still rocks………..at least for now. He got a little wishy-washy during the GOP debate re: the choice issue (i.e., “It’s okay if the Supreme Court overrules Roe. It’s okay if the Supreme Court uses Roe as precedent to uphold the right to reproductive choice.”)
I started visualizing Both Ways standing next to that horse’s ass all over again. But I’m glad Rudy has decided, win or lose, to stand on his past position.
Let’s see if he does the same with civil unions for same sex couples.
We all know she’s going to get the nomination and win the presidency. Come on, Richardson?! He was horrible in the debate and has a great resume, but Hillary has the experience of being 8 years in the White House–a royal flush trumps two pairs.
Don’t gamble with the future… vote Richardson! 7 terms in Congress, Secretary of Energy, UN Ambassador, twice elected Governor, and 4 nominations for the Nobel Peace Prize… now there is your royal flush.
Both have the experience and the skill to be a good president. Richardson has the experience but he seems to be missing some of the skill set.
I agree. But I do think Gore has the experience and especially, the environmental awareness, which are huge pluses to his candidacy.
more and more folks will see the great plans HRC will lay out. She is smart, experienced and will show a vision of America Renewed.
Did you write that, or did someone hand you a notecard?
They haven’t distributed the note cards yet.
She’s got Bill by her side and they know how to win! They’ve won in the red state of AR and they’ve won nationally so I know they can do it again. Richardson seems like he could do a pretty good job to either of those two and I’d be happy.
After all, he who casts the vote decides nothing … and the company that counts the votes decides everything!
Might as well just bow to the inevitable….
Hagel is now talking about running as an independent with Mike Bloomberg as his running mate! Hagel may play the role of Ross Perot next year. It’ll be another 43%-38%-19% split again with a Clinton coming out on top!
Ordinarily it would be a no-brainer: two republicans on the ballot is good for the dem. But if most people are voting primarily on the war, and most people want the US out of the war, isn’t the only hope of a pro-war republican to split the anti-war vote among two strong anti-war candidates?
He is bonafide social and fiscal conservative. I think he would be a protest vote for conservative Repubs fed up with war and deficit excesses. On the other hand his views on other issues make him less appealing to more moderate anti-war voters.
As a strongly anti-war Dem, my calculation would be that with a Democratic congressional majority behind her, even a triangulator like Hilary could get us out of Iraq eventually. I have a lot of respect for Hagel’s political courage but no way I could support him for Pres considering the available Dem alternatives.
The speculation is a Hagel/Bloomberg ticket or a Bloomberg/Hagel ticket. I would bet on the later. Such a stint would have to rely on Bloomberg’s vast wealth. Why would he bankroll a presidential campaign just to have a second-tier job for four years? The guy is an execuitive to the bone, and I doubt he would settle for anything less than the number one spot.
and bloomberg on top just doesn’t have the same zing to it. I don’t think most people know much about him except he’s a wealthy NYC mayor and that just doesn’t sell to middle america.
Bloomberg wouldn’t bankroll a losing bid. The best Bloomberg/Hagel could get is maybe 4%, hurting the R candidate but with no shot at a win. They aren’t even on the radar.
but I have to admit that I respect her for not calling her vote a mistake like a lot of others have done. Of course it could be that there’s no way to say she would have done it differently without looking like a flip flopper (think John Kerry).
I wish I had bookmarked it but a few weeks ago I saw that some conservative columnist was basically saying that Bush has already cost the Republicans the 2008 Presidential election so conservatives had better get behind the most conservative Democrat running, and he concluded that HRC was that candidate. He mentioned how she’s handled the Iraq war issue, and pointed out that her fiscal policies really are more conservative than liberal, universal health care or no.
I’ll see if I can find it again. It was very interesting.
Here’s the link, from the Washington Times which ain’t no stinkin’ liberal rag.
Where the heck is he? He’s Colorado’s native son, for crying out loud, yet he’s outpolled by Kucinich (ten to one Sir Robin cast that vote…). Not to mention Ron Paul.
Tancredo knew full well that he’d have been trounced had he dared run for Senate…
At this rate, pretty soon CP will have to take Tancredo off the voting list and put in Jim Gilmore and Mike Gravel…